Great fights were put together on paper, and really only one didn't live up to my expectations (I wanted Melvin to win decisively). Dunham and Sherk lived up to it, and I hoped to see Bader be dominant. The under card was really good (gotta DL the untelevised prelims), and I left the sports bar before the main event because I really don't care for either Mir or Cro Cop, and it like the 10 minute drive home was more eventful than the fight. All in all something needs to be done about the judging, because that shit last night was horrible. I wanted Melvin to win but 30-27 was ridiculous, yes you can make the argument for Sherk, but Dunham got screwed, and Bader/Lil Nog. WTF? Can anyone find a better argument to fix the scoring system? I have a what I think is a great idea, and I'll post it soon. Point: I was really disturbed by the judging that shit is scary.
cmon!!!!!!!....sherk won that fight!!!!!!...plain n simple......sherk won the first and the second (it was close)...he won the second cause he dominates (press him to the cage and get the TK) and getts the better of the exchanges for 3min40sec of that round...then was dunham.....and dunham gets the third...win for sherk (dunham mistake was going for the guillotine, he should just turn and let lose).....guillard its transforming in a greg jackson product...too afraid of engage (ala frankie edgar)......and yes i think lil nog won....